跳到正文
Nature Biotechnology·· 19 小时前AI 评分40

脊髓损伤血流控制的闭环方案:超声监测驱动去甲肾上腺素输注

Closing the loop on blood flow control in spinal cord injury

AI 导读

研究设计了一种闭环控制器,依据超声测得的脊髓血流量调节药物输注,在动物中稳定损伤部位灌注并保留神经功能。该方案针对脊髓损伤后仅靠升压保护组织、不直接监测脊髓血流的问题,采用去甲肾上腺素进行闭环反馈控制。

正文 · 原文
  • Research Briefing
  • Published: 29 October 2026

Nature Biomedical Engineering (2026) Cite this article

After spinal cord injury, clinicians raise blood pressure to protect tissue without directly monitoring the effect on the cord, exposing patients to harm. We designed a closed-loop controller that adjusts drug infusion in response to ultrasonography-based measurements of spinal cord blood flow, stabilizing perfusion at the injury site and preserving neurological function in animals.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Access through your institution

Access Nature and 54 other Nature Portfolio journals

Get Nature+, our best-value online-access subscription

32.70 € / 30 days cancel any time

Learn more

Subscribe to this journal

Receive 12 digital issues and online access to articles

111.21 € per year only 9.27 € per issue

Learn more

Buy this article

  • Purchase on SpringerLink
  • Instant access to the full article PDF.

39,95 €

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Additional access options:

Fig. 1: Closed-loop control stabilizes blood flow and preserves function after SCI.

This figure presents a study of a closed-loop system for stabiizing blood flow and its implementation in rat and pig models of injury. Panel a depicts the experimental setup in the rat model, where norepinephrine infusion rate is set by a controller and spinal cord blood flow is measured by ultrasonography. A closed loop is created by feeding back blood flow values to the controller to adjust infusion in real time. Panel b compares walking scores of rats with closed-loop or open-loop control of norepinephrine administration, showing that walking scores decrease similarly in both closed-loop and open-loop control groups after injury. There is a further decrease in walking score in the open-loop control group after the simulated intensive care unit stay, but not in the closed-loop group. Panel c shows time-course data for norepinephrine infusion rate, blood pressure (mean arterial pressure) and blood flow (mean flow velocity) in a pig model of injury after an acute drop in blood pressure. The closed-loop group shows recovery of mean flow velocity back to baseline, whereas the open-loop group stays low.

References

  1. Routkevitch, D. et al. Spinal cord vascular autoregulation: key concepts and opportunities to improve management. Spinal Cord 64, 14–28 (2026). This article reviews the relationship between blood pressure and spinal cord blood flow, with a focus on clinical importance.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Gallagher, M. J. et al. Spinal cord blood flow in patients with acute spinal cord injuries. J. Neurotrauma 36, 919–929 (2019). This paper showed that spinal cord blood flow can be measured in patients and that it deviates from systemic blood pressure.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Squair, J. W. et al. Spinal cord perfusion pressure predicts neurologic recovery in acute spinal cord injury. Neurology 89, 1660–1667 (2017). This article illustrated the imprecision of pressure-based management and its impact on patient outcomes.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Khaing, Z. Z. et al. Perfusion imaging metrics after acute traumatic spinal cord injury are associated with injury severity in rats and humans. Sci. Transl. Med. 16, eadn4970 (2024). This study showed that ultrasonography-derived perfusion metrics after spinal cord injury predict injury severity.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Chesnut, R. et al. A management algorithm for adult patients with both brain oxygen and intracranial pressure monitoring: the Seattle International Severe Traumatic Brain Injury Consensus Conference (SIBICC). Intensive Care Med. 46, 919–929 (2020). This study is an example of the clinical use of end-organ physiology guiding treatment in patients with traumatic brain injury.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

This is a summary of: Routkevitch, D. et al. Optimal closed-loop feedback control of blood flow after spinal cord injury with norepinephrine. Nat. Biomed. Eng. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41551-026-01777-6 (2026).

D.R., N.V.T. and N.T. used Claude AI to help prepare their contribution to this Research Briefing.

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Closing the loop on blood flow control in spinal cord injury. Nat. Biomed. Eng (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41551-026-01784-7

Download citation

  • Published: 29 October 2026

  • Version of record: 29 October 2026

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41551-026-01784-7

来源:Nature Biotechnology · nature.com

AI 摘要声明:站内标题、摘要与推荐理由由模型基于公开来源生成,属机器生成内容,非原文;本页内容仅供医药行业信息参考,不构成医疗建议、诊断或用药依据。